Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/07/07
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Don Dory wrote: Bob, The Telyt is an achromat, only two colors controlled. So, when examined closely, you will see color fringing. Until Canon started using flourite and Nikon came up with ED glass and Leica started using glass with a lot of flourite in it the Telyt's were about as good as it got. Now it is better. Don - Thanks for posting up these facts-of-the-matter along with the historical perspective. I know from the difference between APO & Achro in theory and I'm also pretty sure that this is indeed just a worst-case scenario that really makes the phenomenon graphically apparent. So, here is my current thinking about this: Firstly, it is quite interesting (to me, anyway) that a lens with this degree of CA (actually, thanks to Doug Herr for pointing out that it's more specifially referred to as Lateral Chromatic Aberration) produces such damn good imaging under normal circumstances. Second, it seems that there may actually be some sample-to-sample (or years-of-production) variation among these lenses; because Doug sez he's never seen it look this bad in any of his stuff. (More reports from more users would certainly be of help in determining this.) If this is true, then anyone who's thinking about buying one of these things might wanna shoot a couple of quick digisnaps that include areas of quick transitions from deep black to bright white and ramp up the camera's display to an Actual Pixels magnification. Thirdly, my goal with this kinda thing is to understand the tools as well as possible so that I can exploit their strenghts and minimize their foibles. Gee... do you think I oughtta forward some of this thread to Uncle Erwin?? Bob Palmieri