Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/04/02
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]My Leica M lens collection just grew a little. I came across a used 50/2.8 Elmar, latest version, that I couldn't pass up. I'm always a sucker for 50mm lenses. (Sidebar: I was going to give the digital equivalent just to be DC -- digitally correct -- but I overheated my calculator trying to calculate the equivalent for each sensor size). I bought the Elmar to compliment my 50/1.4 Summilux (and hopefully a Noctilux in the near future). Here are some observations about the 50/2.8 Elmar based on my initial use. The new Elmar is definately not the same lens as it's ancient predecessor. I had an old type collapsable Elmar years ago, and the new version is much improved, especially at close distances. It's also less prone to flare. The 50/2.8 Elmar is not a lot more compact than a Summicron, particularly if you leave on the lens shade. But it is slightly more compact, and that does make a difference. With lens shade removed and the lens collapsed it's not much bigger than a body cap.The Elmar is also less expensive than a Summicron. The Elmar takes 39mm filters. That gives me a chance to use the many I own. I haven't had a lens that they fit since I sold my 35/2. The one thing that takes getting used to is expanding the Elmar. During the first few times of use I took a few shots before I realized that I hadn't fully extended the lens. The Elmar is very quick to focus. I can focus it much faster than I can the Summilux. I can probably focus the Elmar more quickly than any other M lens I own. I did some street photography yesterday. Even though I'm way out of practice, I was able to snap things into focus very quickly. Wide open at f2.8 the Elmar is quite usable. I shot indoors in less that perfect light using TMax 400 rated at 800. The images were fine. I don't have access to my scanner right now, but when I do I'll post some samples. Finally, I think the 50/2.8 Elmar is going to be a very good compliment to 50 'lux Some of the time ( in fact make that most of the time) I like to keep things as simple as possible. That means a compact lens on a compact body. The Elmar fits that bill, and 50 just happens to be my favorite focal length. At least when it comes to film :-) In summary, quick focusing ability, compact size, optical quality, and low cost are the biggest positives to the 50/2.8 Elmar. Maximum aperture, and the fact that expanding the lens takes some getting used to, and the only negatives. It's a good compliment to one of the big and fast 50mm lenses, particularly if you have multiple M bodies. daveR