Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/03/11

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re - Couple of E-330 shots, well one more at least (Ted's question)
From: tedgrant at shaw.ca (Ted Grant)
Date: Sat Mar 11 08:32:46 2006
References: <20060311002518.235CC3A3DD5@mxo3.broadbandsupport.net> <001d01c644bb$815ce600$73b56c18@ted> <8252616.1142055159986.JavaMail.s_gregory1@mac.com>

Scott Gregory offered
Subject: Re: [Leica] Re - Couple of E-330 shots, well one more at least 
(Ted's question)


> Ted:
>
> I've never shot with an R or owned an R lens and body, only used M's. 
> Although I do remember shooting an SL years ago that my father in law 
> owned.... he loved the 90 lens especially on the SL. But you might be 
> interested in an article in the new Photo Techniques mag that should be 
> now on your newstand. Near the back there is an article on a comparison of 
> the Canon 1Ds Mk 11, the Olympus E (not sure which model though) and the 
> R9 with a DMR.
> Glancing through the article I noticed that the Canon took most of the 
> accolades, but when it came to printing on an Epson digital printer for 
> final output, the reviewer raved about the DMR results compared to the 
> Canon. But then I think he started to talk about the idea of the R lens on 
> the Canon. Give it a read if you can.<<<<

HI Scott,
I'll be let out today ;-) So I'll check out Chapters for Phototechniques as 
several have made mention of this particular article.
thanks,
ted


In reply to: Message from neal at nairobisafari.com (Neal Friedenthal) ([Leica] Re - Couple of E-330 shots, well one more at least)
Message from tedgrant at shaw.ca (Ted Grant) ([Leica] Re - Couple of E-330 shots, well one more at least)
Message from s_gregory1 at mac.com (Scott Gregory) ([Leica] Re - Couple of E-330 shots, well one more at least (Ted's question))