Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/02/20

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] silver vs pixels
From: images at InfoAve.Net (Tina Manley)
Date: Mon Feb 20 13:04:46 2006
References: <76511ACE-8D8E-4E1F-A02E-28646D43130A@interlink.es> <001901c63660$388294c0$656c0e44@newukolbqveo9i>
 
At 03:57 PM 2/20/2006, you wrote:
>Is there a good B&W digital printer out there that doesn't cost a fortune
>and doesn't go belly up after 30 prints?
>
>Jeffery Smith

How does the saying go?  Fast, cheap, or good - choose 2?  The Epson 
4800 costs a fortune but it is referred to as an engine.  There is no 
comparison between the big printing engines and the small 
printers.  My 3000's lasted for years and are still going strong - 
and still for sale, too ;-)  but this isn't Friday.

Tina

Tina Manley, ASMP
http://www.tinamanley.com
Replies: Reply from jsmith342 at cox.net (Jeffery Smith) ([Leica] silver vs pixels)
 In reply to: Message from lmc at interlink.es (Luis Miguel Castañeda) ([Leica] silver vs pixels)
Message from jsmith342 at cox.net (Jeffery Smith) ([Leica] silver vs pixels)