Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/02/14
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]>The SX-70 does count, but this is the first time I've seen folding >done in the middle of an optical train and I think it may point the >way to one new approach to digital camera design. > >> >>In a message dated 2/14/2006 9:46:58 A.M. Central Standard Time, >>shino@panix.com writes: >> >>does the polaroid sx-70 count? folded optics and foldable as >>well. plus, through the lens viewing. >>-rei >>Sure it does, so does the pentaprism or mirror prism in any SLR. folded >>optics have been around a long time. Just another jazz to sell a digicam >>to >>someone who needs a list of features before they will buy. >> Minolta (before they were bought up by Konica) introduced a folded optic P&S digicam with exactly the same sort of lens a couple of years ago, and Pentax followed with the same shortly after. This is not a new development. Any use of prisms and/or/mirrors makes a 'folded' optical path, because using just full lenses keeps the optical path linear overall. At what point a partial lens becomes a prism is of course a matter of opinion. :-) -- * Henning J. Wulff /|\ Wulff Photography & Design /###\ mailto:henningw@archiphoto.com |[ ]| http://www.archiphoto.com