Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/02/14
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]>The SX-70 does count, but this is the first time I've seen folding
>done in the middle of an optical train and I think it may point the
>way to one new approach to digital camera design.
>
>>
>>In a message dated 2/14/2006 9:46:58 A.M. Central Standard Time,
>>shino@panix.com writes:
>>
>>does the polaroid sx-70 count? folded optics and foldable as
>>well. plus, through the lens viewing.
>>-rei
>>Sure it does, so does the pentaprism or mirror prism in any SLR. folded
>>optics have been around a long time. Just another jazz to sell a digicam
>>to
>>someone who needs a list of features before they will buy.
>>
Minolta (before they were bought up by Konica) introduced a folded
optic P&S digicam with exactly the same sort of lens a couple of
years ago, and Pentax followed with the same shortly after. This is
not a new development.
Any use of prisms and/or/mirrors makes a 'folded' optical path,
because using just full lenses keeps the optical path linear overall.
At what point a partial lens becomes a prism is of course a matter of
opinion. :-)
--
* Henning J. Wulff
/|\ Wulff Photography & Design
/###\ mailto:henningw@archiphoto.com
|[ ]| http://www.archiphoto.com