Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/01/27
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]You are back peddling, just like that Texan. This term paper just doesn't wash. Your research is weak. You pretend to agree with me, but cite crapola. Sorry, you get a D. In a message dated 1/27/2006 8:43:31 P.M. Central Standard Time, puff11@comcast.net writes: >>This pending disaster should have >>been obvious to everyone, especially given the decades long awareness of the >>potential events just waiting to happen. Just watch CNN, last week they reported AGAIN the LSU models that were sent to the White House days before the storm, also months before the storm, to no avail. >>What I was trying to say is that >>there were so many individual and collective failures over so much time, >>that there is simply no constructive purpose in finger pointing and name >>calling. Absolutely wrong, the denizens should be outed >>The economic value of the port and the oil/gas industry to the nation or >>to >>>the local economy is not in doubt. ..... You totally ignored that in your first post. You were ready to write the city off, move it where? >>>I think the Netherlands makes my point. blah blah blah, where did you find this crap? on Google? >>>That's not a model that I endorse though. Clearly you endorse moving the entire population to the desert. >>>I feel that we Americans are faced with a much more open ended choice. At >>>this time the more humane and, to me more constructive solution is to spend >>>the money on people, not on the edifices. So, no housing for them? >>There are a large number of destitute and displaced persons, and a large number of >>suffering people who are still in the muck and mire, and they need help. They need >>money to see doctors, they need education to rise them out of the poverty they >>lived in while trapped in that socio-economic prison. So if we don't rebuild, where will they live and work? And you elegant solution ignores people who like me (once, I was not a victim) owned a nice house in Lakeview that had ten feet of water, and cannot gte insurance money. Many lost their jobs, their possessions, even loved ones. Those people need help finding new jobs and replacing lost possessions. They need help to relocate if they choose, and they need an opportunity and time to heal and to grow. I said that before you. I think you stole the thought. >>>Once that need is met, once that human crisis is addressed, then they or >>anyone else who wants to build a city there, using Dutch or other >>>approaches, should be encouraged to have a go at it. . Just the opposite of your earlier post. Are you gonna ask to kiss me next? >>>Even if I accepted that there are transcendental reasons why the city >>>must >>>be rebuilt - I then have to ask - at whose expense? Should I pay >>>anything >>>for this? You will no matter what. We all will. In Louisiana, we are paying by not having budgets to pay for paper to run the copy machines for our students. (A tiny example) Public employees are furloughed and we can't hire employees to replace those who left. We are paying, while you play with Google. But mind me well, you will be paying. >>>To be more explicit - should my tax dollars go to this venture? >>>Why? I'm not convinced that there is a reason for me to want to do this, >>>given my preference for spending the money on helping the victims directly, >>>rather than in funding a city renovation. It aint the United Way, you don't have a choice. >>I'm not being obtuse - I really want to understand, from folks who have a vested >>interest in the outcome:why should I want to fund this? Because it will benefit you. So you can buy a new Kia that is being delivered through the Port of New Orleans. >> I am sorry that you see those feelings as a pat on the hand and an exhortation >>that it will be all right. I meant nothing so demeaning and trite. Then come down and shoot it yourself. Don't tell us that it will be better if we shoot. You got a camera or just a thesaurus? Sonny