Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/01/18
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]actually, the size is rather different given these dimensions. the circumscribing rectangular solids have volumes of: leica 13.8*7.95*3.8 = 416.898 cc canon 14.4*10.5*7.15 = 1081.080 cc or a difference of slightly over 2 1/2 times. -rei On Jan18 10:55, feli wrote: > That may be so, but you put the two side by side and the difference is > pretty obvious. > > feli > -----Original Message----- > >From: mcyclwritr@comcast.net > > > > >"...over-sized, over-weight...." > > > >Let us readeth from the websites of Leica and Canon. > > > >Leica M7 measures 138mm x 79.5mm x 38mm. Weight: 610g w/o batts. > >Canon 20D is 144mm x 105mm x 71.5mm. Weight: 685g w/o batt. > > > >Shall we add a 50mm f/1.4 lens to each so we can capture an image? > >Oh, why the hell not. > > > >Leica M7 with 50mm f/1.4 weighs 945g. > >Canon 20D with 50mm f/1.4 weighs 975g. > > > >-Chris Lawson -- Rei Shinozuka shino@panix.com Ridgewood, New Jersey