Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/01/12
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]On Jan 12, 2006, at 09:04, lug-request@leica-users.org wrote: > > I've always wondered how that would work. The Nikon LS-5000 is not > very good at finding frames. I almost always have to fiddle with the > pre-scan. Once you set it for the first one on a roll, does it manage > to find the rest fairly well? The Nikon roll adapter costs more than some scanners. I have not tried one, most reports suggest it works though I did read of some problems. An alternative to the attachment, at least for batch proof scans (and with some advantages if you have a significant amount of film already cut in strips) would be one of the better flat bed scanners (the Canon 9950 or several similar Epson's). The Canon can handle 5 strips of 6, the Epson's take up to 4 strips. The Canon is fairly reliable at finding frames. Scan quality is according to other reports inferior to a good dedicated scanner (e.g. Nikon 5000 or the Minolta 5400), but the flatbeds also scan larger formats and positives, and cost same or less than the Nikon bulk attachment.