Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/01/09
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]>>> The issue is why this Yao character would impose his personal distaste >>> for a List member on a List posting. <<<<<< Now now Marc as a good legal beagle you know that's an assumption without proof! That is unless you have names of the sendee and receivee! Yep we all saw it on list, so what, only one party was identified. Is everyone here so clean they've never sent a post in error? Or hit send and said... "unprintable." >>If Yao had meant for this to be a private > missive, then I would anticipate an immediate statement from him that his > posting of this extremely crude tell-off to this fellow was meant for > private communication.<<< But then you have no idea why he made the comment in the first place, nor what it was in reference to. And without both sides of the story or postings, who are list members to make assumptions? And certainly telling Joseph what to do. Particularly when absolutely no one on this list has the absolute truth of what was being referred to. >>> As Yao has not done so, he seems to want this to be viewed as his public > persona. If so, he must be a really prize jerk.<< Sorry you are way over blowing this and damn near making a fool of yourself in this comment. > > HINT: an apology to the List is in order. <<<< Sorry it's the list members, some anyway, who should be apologizing to Joseph! Marc, Sorry mate I quite frankly do not think the aforementioned post by Joseph is of anyone on this lists business! Period. Certainly when no one has any idea what it's about other than the suppositions being read into it. As well as a near character assassination of one very fine person. Damn it, it's like some kind of witch hunt fired by inane curiosity by people with nothing better to do than carry on like a bunch of scallywags! As you are friend of mine, I'd defend you in similar manner as I am Joseph as he's also a friend, both of you first class people in my mind. But with all the unknowns being bantered about by members, you included, who don't have a clue what the hell the initial post was about. I'd have thought people here were wiser and more understanding of others. But this is a ridiculous!! Quite frankly Joseph is one damn fine person and absolutely honest in his photographic dealings. The other side of this complete charade of a seemingly stupid witch hunt isn't of anyone's damn business, period! Actually there are only 2 people involved, that is whomever the post was directed to and Joseph. The rest of you who are hunting down some kind of response to your sick curiosity, why don't you go take pictures and chill out. Because quite frankly, and this one more time, "It's none of your damn business to know.... PERIOD!" Thank you. ted