Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/12/01

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Re: Feli's XTOL
From: dlridings at gmail.com (Daniel Ridings)
Date: Thu Dec 1 05:28:15 2005
References: <1D7BAA95-C7D4-4A8A-958C-DE2979BA4B9E@charter.net> <BFB4396A.1FAC9%mark@rabinergroup.com>
 
On 12/1/05, Mark Rabiner <mark@rabinergroup.com> wrote:

> Just to keep you on your toes one out of ten times when they have "NEW and
> improved" on the label it actually is! So that's supposed to get you to
> believe them the other times. Delta PLUS or something like that. PLUS means
> develop twice as long.

I think it was worse than that Mark. Didn't they do something like a switch:

Professional Delta
Delta Professional

where the one was the old version and the other was the new version. I
hate binary choices. Who can keep track of them?

Daniel
Replies: Reply from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Re: Feli's XTOL)
 In reply to: Message from s.dimitrov at charter.net (Slobodan Dimitrov) ([Leica] Re: Feli's XTOL)
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Re: Feli's XTOL)