Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/11/29
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]On 11/29/05 6:24 PM, "Scott Gregory" <s_gregory1@mac.com> typed: > Mark: when you mention going to the 2400 Epson, if you have not done so > yet, > pick up the December issue of Shutterbug and read the review by David > Brooks. > He has tested a lot of the newer Epson printers lately in Shutterbug and I > found the article very encouraging. In fact he has a dedicated Epson > printer > for B&W and he says that the 2400 outshines for black and white. > New life for you Leica images in B&W?? Go for it! > > Scott > Well I'm going into reading it, and thanks for the tip, with the idea that the three Epson grays going against the carbon quads of so many colors. All grays, all carbon do not anything close to an even match make. Despite a difference in resolution. But will certainly buy it and read it. I'm getting the new 2400 and am not going to sell my trusty 2200 which I've learned to love. Or the 4800 even if that's the right number. I'm putting my 2200 to work and I'm betting it will be a contender. I've got one word for you son: Carbon. And its not part of the new Epson Inkset. Mark Rabiner Photography Portland Oregon http://rabinergroup.com/