Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2005/11/13
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] OT: bronica 645 RF?
From: michiel.fokkema at wanadoo.nl (Michiel Fokkema)
Date: Sun Nov 13 12:56:41 2005
References: <2klan1l6estp00noo56hr8650p25gfu540@4ax.com> <43759EEA.6080109@wanadoo.nl> <4375F2F1.2010405@hemenway.com> <2fcen1lgl3cbsdj5l03q492aakbqfo3o0k@4ax.com> <43777F61.1080309@hemenway.com> <r39fn1dueb03jtcl4i19ce3iteadlm23du@4ax.com>
Eric wrote:
> I might just keep saving my MF funds until I can get a Rollei. Might as
> well go for the best, eh? I was hoping a Bronica RF or Mamiya 6 or 7 would
> be hand holdable in low light. Just a big Leica cousin. But I'm hearing
> differently. If I'm going to be stuck on a tripod, might as well start
> getting some mirror slap to make things interesting. :)
>
Hi Eric,
In my experience the Bronica RF is very hand holdable in low light
because it has no mirror and because it has a central shutter. Hardly
any vibrations at all, even less than a Leica M. Combined with the large
handrip, 1/30th is not a problem at all, 1/15th is really feasible and
slower is oke now and then.
Cheers,
Mihciel Fokkema
Replies:
Reply from lmc at interlink.es (Luis Miguel Castañeda) ([Leica] OT: bronica 645 RF?)
In reply to:
Message from ericm at pobox.com (Eric) ([Leica] OT: bronica 645 RF?)
Message from michiel.fokkema at wanadoo.nl (Michiel Fokkema) ([Leica] OT: bronica 645 RF?)
Message from Jim at hemenway.com (Jim Hemenway) ([Leica] OT: bronica 645 RF?)
Message from ericm at pobox.com (Eric) ([Leica] OT: bronica 645 RF?)
Message from Jim at hemenway.com (Jim Hemenway) ([Leica] OT: bronica 645 RF?)
Message from ericm at pobox.com (Eric) ([Leica] OT: bronica 645 RF?)