Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/11/02

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: Film vs. Digital [was Re: [Leica] Re:Leica D200]
From: dlridings at gmail.com (Daniel Ridings)
Date: Wed Nov 2 08:28:56 2005
References: <12018087.1130948434907.JavaMail.root@elwamui-hound.atl.sa.earthlink.net>
 
On 11/2/05, Douglas Herr <telyt@earthlink.net> wrote:

> The problem is that as the newer and better equipment becomes available 
> the minimum acceptable publication standards also change.  It wasn't long 
> ago that this photo 
> http://www.wildlightphoto.com/mammals/lagomorphs/pika00.jpg sold well to 
> book and magazine publishers, including Audubon magazine.  Films and 
> lenses have improved enough since the photo was made that photo editors 
> are now expecting better technical quality, and this particular photo is 
> no longer usable in many markets.
>
>

Good point. I had forgotten about that.

Daniel
In reply to: Message from telyt at earthlink.net (Douglas Herr) (Film vs. Digital [was Re: [Leica] Re:Leica D200])