Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2005/11/01
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] Re:Leica D200
From: wooderson at gmail.com (Matt Powell)
Date: Tue Nov 1 19:55:05 2005
References: <25229337.1130876375153.JavaMail.root@elwamui-hound.atl.sa.earthlink.net> <20051101222836.85761.qmail@web34013.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <9b678e0511011817t5259faafh22546ead6ce19f6f@mail.gmail.com> <22c93b290511011820w4d858415y5e29adb71240c186@mail.gmail.com> <4dccee3d0511011821l57442bdel966db4cbdcc3af9f@mail.gmail.com>
On 11/1/05, David C. Mason <dcm@pobox.com> wrote:
> If it takes great photos who cares if its full frame or not?
> Dave
Because there's no such thing as good, cheap, small and fast
wide/normal lenses for the APS-sized cameras.
If they were to come out with a digital-only 20/1.4 or 35/1.4 (to
match the fast 35 or 50 I usually use on an SLR), great - but the
trend seems to run toward largish, expensive constant-aperture zooms
(at f/2.8 or f/4) and I don't think I'm going to see my desired
primes.
--
Matt Powell
wooderson@gmail.com
Replies:
Reply from tedgrant at shaw.ca (Ted Grant) ([Leica] Re:Leica D200)
In reply to:
Message from feli2 at earthlink.net (feli) ([Leica] OT: Nikon D200)
Message from zoeica1 at yahoo.com (Chris Williams) ([Leica] Re:Leica D200)
Message from don.dory at gmail.com (Don Dory) ([Leica] Re:Leica D200)
Message from wooderson at gmail.com (Matt Powell) ([Leica] Re:Leica D200)
Message from dcm at pobox.com (David C. Mason) ([Leica] Re:Leica D200)