Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/10/07
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Silver 1.5v cells have a similar voltage stability over their useful life as mercury cells. You are right that alkaline cells are a poor choice. John Collier On 7-Oct-05, at 7:40 AM, Simon PJ wrote: > Thanks for this information, Didier. > > I vaguely remember a potential problem to do with the voltage > stability of > alkaline batteries compared to the mercury batteries: that the mercury > batteries retain a relatively steady voltage until they fail, while > the > alkaline batteries are constantly reducing in voltage. Presumably > this is > something that the meter electronics have to be able to compensate > for, and > may be a potential problem for the M5, Leicaflex, etc. in which the > meter > circuits were designed to deal with a constant 1.35V > > It's quite likely that I have remembered this wrongly, and invented > the > problem! > > > On 7/10/05 12:40 pm, "Didier Ludwig" <rangefinder@screengang.com> > wrote: > > >> All "new" mercury batteries I had went down after a short time. >> The best is to >> modify the camera's battery tray from 1.35V to 1.5V for the newer >> alkaline >> batteries (there are some in the PX625 size). The job is to solder >> a little >> electric resistance module that reduces the voltage for 0.15V. I >> had let this >> done with a Konica Auto-S3 and a Rollei XF 35, for CHF20 ($16 or >> ?9) each >> camera. Before that I had used the 1.5V batteries and corrected it >> with the >> ISO setting (don't remember how much, I had compared it to my M6's >> lightmeter). >> >> Weincell has alternative 1.35V mercury-free batteries, but they >> are quite >> expensive. >> >>> Is it still possible to get hold of 'fresh' mercury batteries for >>> the >>> cameras?