Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/08/24
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]>It would seem logical that if this was the Minolta list and it was >emblazoned with a Minolta logo than half the members of the list would be >very interested in it. > >The idea that members on a Leica list would be very interested in something >with a Leica logo on it being somehow negative is beyond me. >The motivations for putting this up for question or even ridicule are less >obvious. This is true. But the problem BD is remarking is that some LUG members could think that *every* other equipment without the red dot is -merely by this fact- worse what is not always true. And they can desperately trying to find out defects not so evident. I suppose that this may be more frequent in those members whose equipment is, or exclusive or mostly, Leica while users of a variety of brands are less concerned if Leica is always the best or not. In some years this problem will be over as I cannot see Leica preserving for ever his excellence. Felix