Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/08/16
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Ted Grant <tedgrant@shaw.ca> wrote: > Mark Langer offered: > >> I too tend to use a 50mm lens the most, but that begs the question >> "Which 50mm?" It depends on the situation, and has much to do with >> the characteristics of the lens, the body that I'm mounting it on, and >> what I'm using it for. I love the 50mm Summar for portraiture, the >> compactness of the 50mm Elmar, the speed of the Jupiter 3, the image >> rendering capability of the 4th gen. Summicron, the screwmount, >> collapsibility and bokeh of the Summitar (to say nothing of the >> bizarre "barn door" hood for it), the fact that my Nikkor 50/2 goes >> nicely on my Niccas, the heft and build quality of the 50/1.5 Simlar, >> etc. I could go on and on. The problem is that even by concentrating >> on a 50mm lens, there are just so many appealing options for one to >> take.<<<< > > Hi Mark, > That's amazing you have such a range of same focal length lenses and have > to > make decisions on which one to use. I don't know that I've used as many lenses in the 250mm to 300mm range as Mark has 50mm lenses but it might be close (9 at last count). I haven't kept them all; some I've had to give back :-( while others haven't been entirely right for me. For a focal length I depend on for a big portion of my photographs, I want a lens that suits me perfectly: image quality, handling, portability, minimum focus distance, and more are involved in the decision-making process. I sell the less-suitable lenses mostly to pay for the next one which is probably a good thing 'cuz I'd have kept them all - except the loaners - and I'd have to go through the decision-making process every time I use the camera. I'd want to take several and I'd be too bogged down with equipment to make any photographs. Doug Herr Birdman of Sacramento http://www.wildlightphoto.com