Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/07/19

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Zeiss Planar 50/2 vs. latest Summicron 50/2
From: mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner)
Date: Tue Jul 19 22:18:41 2005

On 7/19/05 12:58 PM, "Scott McLoughlin" <scott@adrenaline.com> typed:

> Any particular reasons, subjective or otherwise?
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Scott
> 
> mehrdad wrote:
> 
Scot you're a tad new on the LUG.
Basic LUG rule:
Can't have too many 50's.

It's worse than extension cords.

However I'd like to extend that if I'm somehow empowered to do so to near
50's.
Near Normals.
Close does count like in hand grenade throwing.
Namely 45's and 60's.

Both great.

Oh boy! Sophia Loren!
Oh boy! Chief Justice Warren!

Mark Rabiner
Photography
Portland Oregon
http://rabinergroup.com/





Replies: Reply from clzeni at mindspring.com (Craig Zeni) ([Leica] Zeiss Planar 50/2 vs. latest Summicron 50/2)
In reply to: Message from scott at adrenaline.com (Scott McLoughlin) ([Leica] Zeiss Planar 50/2 vs. latest Summicron 50/2)