Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/07/02

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Re: LUG Digest, Vol 30, Issue 88
From: dennis at hale-pohaku.com (Dennis Painter)
Date: Sat Jul 2 16:52:17 2005
References: <20050702151323.63396.qmail@web52705.mail.yahoo.com>
 
I would suggest caution in this. Some pet products are systemic in the
pet but not in humans, not to mention they do not have to be tested on
humans.

For example, the military's view  on  pet collars on soldiers:
http://www.dix.army.mil/PAO/post03/post041803/Fleacollars.htm

I simply suggest caution.


"Charles C. Stirk Jr" wrote:

> Tina Sorry to hear about the dodgy bits of you trip .
>
> Will just mention I have found  pet shampoo before going
> seems to hold such creepy crawly  critters at bay ..
>
> Charles
Replies: Reply from red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] Re: LUG Digest, Vol 30, Issue 88)
 In reply to: Message from ccstirkjr at yahoo.com (Charles C. Stirk Jr) ([Leica] Re: LUG Digest, Vol 30, Issue 88)