Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/06/02
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Luis I fixed it myself, found the folder, here is the link: http://tinyurl.com/7ljav Difficult to estimate a lens with rather compressed and downscaled jpgs. But it's true the lens doesnt seem to be crispy sharp. Though foto #8 might not have the perfect resolution, it's a very nice shot and this makes the lenses inconveniences forgettable! Didier >Hi all, > >I?ve not do the same comparison on the same conditions Lux/Cron, I show >these pictures to demonstrate IMO why I?m not really satisfied with the Lux >35 Pre ASPH > >Pic #3 is cropped from #2, with bad definition (it was at 1/250 f.5,6 or >4 ?) >No. 1, 4, 5 are correct >On No. 6 and 7 I think that lens show some flare >No. 8, I don?t remember if it was at 1,4 or 2, that?s sure it was a 1/30. No >definition, bad quality. >These are my opinions, I hope have the time the week end to do trials >Lux/cron >What do you think? >Saludos desde Barcelona >Luis