Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/05/24
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]On May 24, 2005, at 10:26 AM, B. D. Colen wrote: > Yup. And what about not having time to get that perfectly exposed > image to > which Frank referred - so the exposure's off a bit, and the film's the > wrong > type? So you fiddle with the development, which gives you a > compromise, and > then you've still got that less-than-perfect exposure. The reality is > that > in that kind of situation, digital can save the day. Well, considering how much exposure range film has (10 stops vs. digital's 6 stops) you would really have the screw things up pretty well, to not get acceptable results. I've pulled stuff out of negatives in Photoshop and other software that would surprise you. And if all fails, just blame the lab. ;-) Feli ________________________________________________________ feli2@earthlink.net 2 + 2 = 4 www.elanphotos.com no archive