Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/05/10
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Henning Wulff wrote: > When Nikon came out with the F80, I started looking around at other > options. The abandonment of the manual focus lenses was written on the > wall, and that was one of the main reasons I had stuck with Nikon. I don't know, Henning. I'm so used to using a hand-held meter with my M's (only have M2, M3 and M4) and Rolleiflexes that the metering has never really been a decisive issue with me. The old 50/1.4 Nikkor from the 70'ies (doesn't even have the AI notches) works just fine on the D100. I have to meter by hand, of course, but as I said. No big deal. I have to do that the majority of times anyway. Works on my F3's too. > Actually, in some respects the 20D works better with the AI lenses than > the D70, or D100. It meters, but of course no automatic diaphragm is > available. I still use some AI Nikkors on my 20D. Now no automatic stop-down would bother me to no end. _That_, for me, would be unusable. > The APS-C vs full frame debate seems pointless to me as the smaller > format is just that; a smaller format. It has advantages and > disadvantages. If you have or can get lenses that give you the angles of > view you want, you're set. I agree. And that little cheapo that Nikon has come out with, the 18-70, is a real bargain. It made me start to like digital. Daniel