Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/05/04

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Peter provokes contentious controversy
From: mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner)
Date: Wed May 4 22:52:42 2005

> 
> And I've sharpened the image a bit more.  Mark Rabiner thinks I don't
> sharpen my images enough.  Perhaps so.  I know that I absolutely loathe
> oversharpened images.  They look totally phony to me.  So I usually err on
> the side of undersharpening.  The same often goes for curve
> adjustments.  I'll adjust a curve, and then back off a bit because I think
> it looks too "processed."  Sometimes an hour or a day later, I wish I'd
> done more.  But often not.
> 
> Anyway, that's my thought process.  Again, thanks to everyone for 
> responding.
> 
> --Peter
> 
>  
This Mark Rabiner over here agrees that under sharpening is better than over
sharpening. But no sharpening at all really looks it.
And that sharpening an image which is jpeged a whole lot is just a can of
worms. Someone's gotta do it!


Mark Rabiner
Photography
Portland Oregon
http://rabinergroup.com/





In reply to: Message from pklein at 2alpha.net (Peter Klein) ([Leica] Peter provokes contentious controversy)