Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2005/05/02
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] Lord of the Rings
From: masonster at gmail.com (David Mason)
Date: Mon May 2 16:39:25 2005
References: <050220051246.29089.4276211800043730000071A1220699849902019B020E9B9CD2020106@comcast.net> <6.2.1.2.2.20050502150214.04ace0f0@mail.screengang.com> <20050502230145.20667.qmail@balhpl01.ncable.net.au> <3.0.2.32.20050502192343.02191f48@pop.infionline.net>
On this movie I will agree with you whole-heartidly :)
On 5/2/05, Marc James Small <msmall@aya.yale.edu> wrote:
> I was rather distressed to note that several of you seem to have found the
> film version of the Lord of Rings unsatsfactory. I found the trilogy
> reflected well most of the books though it comprehensively misses the
> subtle nature of Saruman's degradation into evil. Other than that, the
> films work rather well.
> [snip]
In reply to:
Message from jon.stanton at comcast.net (jon.stanton@comcast.net) ([Leica] RE: digital/film/guitar debate)
Message from rangefinder at screengang.com (Didier Ludwig) ([Leica] RE: digital/film/guitar debate)
Message from firkin at balhpl01.ncable.net.au (firkin) ([Leica] Pens: thoughts before I leave)
Message from msmall at aya.yale.edu (Marc James Small) ([Leica] Lord of the Rings)