Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/04/28

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] digital transformation
From: feli2 at earthlink.net (Feli)
Date: Thu Apr 28 10:40:47 2005
References: <007a01c54c06$0c8f2670$6601a8c0@ccapr.com> <A09AC97E685DF0A22988B1D6@hindolveston.reid.org>

Actually I believe B.D. on this one because I made a test of this.

A while back I printed two negatives 3 ways, fiber, RC and inkjet.
One neg was a nighttime shot the other taken in broad daylight.

The fiber print always looked better, especially the daylight shot.
The daylight RC and inkjet were pretty much intercchangeable.

The inkjet didn't do too well with the nightshot. Just didn't have the 
range of
the other two.

But it's a lot easier to learn how to make a good looking inkjet print 
than
a wet print.

feli


On Apr 28, 2005, at 9:38 AM, Brian Reid wrote:

> B.D.,
>
> Since your posting style is both prolific and combative, sometimes 
> people are hesitant to believe you. If you've got a pair of prints 
> like this (one RC, one on your HP inkjet) maybe you could give them or 
> show them to other nearby LUGgers who could offer their opinion.
________________________________________________________
feli2@earthlink.net                     2 + 2 = 4                      
www.elanphotos.com


no archive


Replies: Reply from jonathan at openhealth.org (Jonathan Borden) ([Leica] digital transformation)
In reply to: Message from bdcolen at earthlink.net (B. D. Colen) ([Leica] digital transformation)
Message from reid at mejac.palo-alto.ca.us (Brian Reid) ([Leica] digital transformation)