Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/03/03

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] The high price of progress
From: dnygr at cshore.com (dnygr)
Date: Thu Mar 3 18:11:25 2005

Someone wrote regarding Contax that certain camera manufacturers didn't 
predict how quickly the change to digital would be and noted how typewriter 
manufacturers had done the same thing.

What a costly change it has been to move from typewriters fo computerized 
word processing. Every few years, our equipment needs to be replaced because 
it is dated. That rate of change and its accompanying cost was not true of 
the typewriter age. I'm not speaking against the change, but I am noting 
that many of us now are spending a lot more money to type our messages than 
we would be if we still used typewriters. I fear the same will be true for 
our photography. We will be spending money on new cameras as ours become 
obsolete. If we print our own photos, we will be spending outrageous amounts 
on printer ink (doesn't it seem that printer ink sells for about $3,000 a 
gallon!). 

What it boils down to, in my estimatin, is that you and I will be spending a 
lot more money in the digitl camera age. It looks like the price of progress.

Doug Nygren 

 
________________________________________________________________



 
                   


Replies: Reply from masonster at gmail.com (David Mason) ([Leica] The high price of progress)
Reply from rangefinder at screengang.com (Didier Ludwig) ([Leica] The high price of progress)
Reply from jshul at comcast.net (Jim Shulman) ([Leica] The high price of progress)
Reply from joelct at singnet.com.sg (joelct) ([Leica] The high price of progress)