Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/02/18

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] FLUG
From: daniel.ridings at edd.uio.no (Daniel Ridings)
Date: Fri Feb 18 03:43:25 2005
References: <191.3935e9b9.2f4727db@aol.com> <Pine.SOL.4.58-L.0502181215210.6552@hedvig.uio.no> <6.1.0.6.2.20050218034211.05fb9630@192.168.100.42>
 
> >Yeah, Sonny, I was going to say "at least a roll of film a month" ... that
> >sure isn't much. Certainly not enough to justify a Leica instead of a
> >Yashica T4.
>
> Nah, first of all, it's a low water mark. No one says anything about the
> high water mark.

Yeah, I know. I should have made that clear.

> Second, any pictures, crappy or otherwise, should be taken with a Leica :-)

Agreed! :-)

> As I said before, has anyone ever looked at a great picture and say, "Geez,
> I WISH I have taken it with a crapola camera instead of the Leica?" :-)

Maybe some of those Loma Luma Diana whatever they're called people would.

Now wait a minute Richard! I thought you left us! :) Welcome back!
Daniel
In reply to: Message from SonC at aol.com (SonC@aol.com) ([Leica] FLUG)
Message from daniel.ridings at edd.uio.no (Daniel Ridings) ([Leica] FLUG)
Message from richard-lists at imagecraft.com (Richard) ([Leica] FLUG)