Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/02/12
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]An excellent source is Osterloh's Leica M The Advanced School of Photography. pp53-63. Another source I use for information is Image Clarity High-Resolution Photography by J. Williams. Very technical and way over my head in comprehending formulas. I'm not a trained optical engineer but I read a lot about all types lenses whenever I can. With feedback on all camera forums, one can guesstimate if a certain lens will suit thier personal needs. And leave some muttering to themselves "I wonder where the bokeh went when they added that aspherical element" when they sell their 20 year old lens and purchase the newest SOTA lens design. I've been following Leica posts for years about MTF's & nothing ever mentioned that MTF's indicate how well a lens holds contrast in the image. Some lenses are designed to hold center sharpness & minimum peripheral & others designed to give an overall balance with center sharpness sacrificed to improve edge performance. Here's an example. >From a family of curves ( 50 nocti, Summilux & 'cron lenses) you'll find the imaging quality of one lens is superior to that of another at one aperture setting, but inferior at different settings. However just looking at MTF's is only a part of the lens performance. Simply, Modular Transfer Functions together with the Phase Transfer Function (main characteristic to evaluate coma) are parts of the Optical Transfer Function. Note: MTF curves reveals nothing about color correction. The answer of why M lenses gives more of a 3D image on the negative is something we all have been wondering about. To date, I have not found a hint of this in any Leica literature. One can only hope this *fingerprint* is carried over to the digital bodies. This should keep all of the weekend workbench warriors busy thinking for the rest of the winter. denik