Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/02/07
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Daniel...it should be obvious that pulling out an M2 is the best way to end up with candlelight and a pretty woman! ;) You may also be glad to hear that I shot some variations of this with my Rolleicord, which seemed pleased to be allowed to participate, but this is the only photo from the shoot that my wife is comfortable with me posting on-line, so you'll have to take my word for it! I think the HC110 time I posted is actually from Kodak's specs...I admit I'm not a big tester...I usually try something and then do nothing more than maybe next time adding/removing 30 secs or changing the agitation if I wasn't entirely happy the last time. Not really formal testing, but that's the most I can handle, I'm afraid. With this combo, I was happy the first time, so I stuck with it. The full details are: HC110 1+31 at 68F, 5.5mins (starting when all of the dev is in the can, and start pouring out 15 sec early so the stop hits the film right at 5.5mins). Gentle inverse/spin agitation the first 30secs, then 5secs out of every 30secs, skipping the last one. As you say, something to start with, anyway. Best, Aaron >Get your priorities straight ... candlelight and a pretty woman ... > >and you pull out an M2????????? > >It's nice. > >Thanks for the Tri-X/HC110 starting point too. I've gone over to HC110 for >just about everything now (I'm lazy, I'll mix up Xtol every so often >because I like it, but liquid developers are just so convenient). > >I've always thought Kodak's times were way off but haven't had the >opportunity to play with some test films. At least I know where I can >reasonably start now. > >Best, >Daniel > >On Mon, 7 Feb 2005, Aaron Sandler wrote: > > http://www.duke.edu/~ajs2/PAW/2005_06/index.html