Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2005/01/22
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] Re: Doomed: Leica MP 0.58x
From: feli2 at earthlink.net (Feli)
Date: Sat Jan 22 00:50:24 2005
References: <NEBBJDFBIKOBILIKPPBNOEPCBBAB.red735i@earthlink.net> <Pine.SOL.4.58-L.0501220604220.20612@hedvig.uio.no> <026501c50040$f6d24710$24a0fea9@MacPhisto> <Pine.SOL.4.58-L.0501220619500.20612@hedvig.uio.no>
I doubt that Daniel. Even Nikon shooters can see the difference between
one of their primes and that zoom.
feli
On Jan 21, 2005, at 9:21 PM, Daniel Ridings wrote:
> Chris,
>
> The crappiest lens I have (seen in PS) is the 50/2.8 Elmar. The
> consumer
> zoom I have (24-85 Nikkor) blows it away.
>
> Once they're out on a print ... you can't tell the difference.
>
> Daniel
_______________________________________________________
feli2@earthlink.net 2 + 2 = 4
www.elanphotos.com
Replies:
Reply from daniel.ridings at edd.uio.no (Daniel Ridings) ([Leica] Re: Doomed: Leica MP 0.58x)
Reply from daniel.ridings at edd.uio.no (Daniel Ridings) ([Leica] Re: Doomed: Leica MP 0.58x)
In reply to:
Message from red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] Doomed: Leica MP 0.58x)
Message from daniel.ridings at edd.uio.no (Daniel Ridings) ([Leica] Doomed: Leica MP 0.58x)
Message from leicachris at worldnet.att.net (Christopher Williams) ([Leica] Re: Doomed: Leica MP 0.58x)
Message from daniel.ridings at edd.uio.no (Daniel Ridings) ([Leica] Re: Doomed: Leica MP 0.58x)