Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/01/20
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]At work (Unit for Digital Documentation) we have a similar task: scanning all of the slides from one of the national (Norway) museums. We're using the setup Tina describes: LS-4000 with a slide feeder. The person doing it doesn't have photographic experience, he's an office worker, but it just chugs along. I have the LS-5000 at home. It's rumoured to be faster. I haven't noticed. I don't know where Nikon gets its 20 second scan times from. Daniel On Wed, 19 Jan 2005, Tina Manley wrote: > At 03:19 PM 1/19/2005, you wrote: > >Hey kids -- I have about six million slides that need to be scanned. I'd > >like to batch scan them, maybe in batches of 10, six million at once is > >not > >practical, they don't all fit in the same room at once.. What should I > >get? > > > >Kc > > Kyle - > > I'm about a tenth of the way through scanning 500,000 slides. I did a lot > of research and got a Nikon 4000 with a batch slide scanner attachment. It > works great. I did have to remount all of the slides and negatives in > thicker plastic mounts - the thin Pakon mounts and cardboard mounts jam > sometimes, but Wes and Gepe slide mounts will scan forever without a > jam. They also hold the film flatter which helps with the scanning. Of > course, since I bought the 4000, Nikon has now come out with the 5000 which > is better and faster, but not enough to justify scrapping the old one > (unless somebody wants to buy it ;-) > > I can put 40 slides in the batch scanner and leave, knowing that they'll > scan perfectly and be waiting for me to file when I return. I couldn't > imagine scanning without the Nikon. I think if you read reviews on the > internet, you'll come to the same conclusion.