Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/01/08

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: OT ! a naked exposure
From: ericm at (Eric)
Date: Sat Jan 8 10:19:01 2005
References: <>


>any lawyers out there?

Why?  I don't see how Wal-mart is in the wrong.

A guy takes a photograph on somebody else's property.  The owners of the
property says they don't like photographs being taken without prior
permission, and that if the photographer doesn't want to hand over the
photo, he isn't welcome back.  If he comes back, he would be legally

Am I missing something?

I'm all for photographers' rights, but I'm also for property owners' rights,
too.  I wouldn't want to be forced to allow other people to do whatever they
want on my property.


Replies: Reply from jefferys at (Jeffery Smith) ([Leica] Re: OT ! a naked exposure)
Reply from jbcollier at (John Collier) ([Leica] Re: OT ! a naked exposure)
Reply from kididdoc at (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] Re: OT ! a naked exposure)
In reply to: Message from kididdoc at (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] OT ! a naked exposure)