Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/01/03

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: Fuji NPH 400 trouble
From: phong at doan-ltd.com (Phong)
Date: Mon Jan 3 07:25:42 2005

Nelson Chan wrote:
> After examining the negatives, I found out in  frames that I used wide
> angle lens, the shot is usually underexposed,  however, when I use
> 50mm to 90mm lenses, the exposure is perfect.
>  I suspect  it is my technic that is at fault since the white dot on the
> M6ttl covers a  wider scope when a wide angle lens is attached vs a
telephoto
> lens.  Where  should I point the camera for exposure reading?

Hi Nelson,

I am not convinced that the problem lies in your technique, since
NPS and Portra 160 work for you, unless you always use different films
for different subjects (say NPS and Portra 160 for close-up portraits,
and NPH for landscapes, or portraits in landscapes).
In any case if the underexposed shots with the wider angles include
areas of sky, you may want to try pointing the camera down when you
meter, to minimize the bias of all that light in the sky.  You may or may
not already know this.

Or use an incident meter.  :-)

Cheers,

- Phong


Replies: Reply from cchan at pldtdsl.net (Nelson Chan) ([Leica] Re: Fuji NPH 400 trouble)
Reply from cchan at pldtdsl.net (Nelson Chan) ([Leica] Re: Fuji NPH 400 trouble)
In reply to: Message from cchan at pldtdsl.net (Nelson Chan) ([Leica] Re: Fuji NPH 400 trouble)