Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/12/12

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Printer experiences of the LUG
From: Jim at hemenway.com (Jim Hemenway)
Date: Sun Dec 12 07:30:47 2004
References: <BDE1C392.39EE0%robinsnes@comcast.net>
 
Roger:

I use an Epson 2200 connected to a G3 with OS X 3.6.  Everything works 
well and I get great prints.

I don't know if the R800 is a small version of the 2200.  If it is, then 
I think that you'll be happy with it.

Jim


Roger Skully wrote:

> I am looking for a new printer .Currently am using an Epson 960... A 6 ink
> dye printer. I have heard and read a great deal about the Epson pigment
> printers, the Epson 2200 and the Epson R800. The R800 received rave reviews
> in the latest Mac World. I stopped at Ritz and the sales manager was 
> gung-ho
> about the Canon i9900. I really do not need images larger than 8x10.
> Longevity past 75-100 years is not a concern, I hope;-)  Ink fade is if it
> happens quickly (5 to 10 years). I work off a Mac powerbook G4 running
> OSX10.3.6 if drivers are a concern. Anyone have experience with any of 
> these
> beasties?
> Thanks
> Roger Skully
>
Replies: Reply from bladman99 at yahoo.ca (Dan C) ([Leica] Printer experiences of the LUG)
 In reply to: Message from robinsnes at comcast.net (Roger Skully) ([Leica] Printer experiences of the LUG)