Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/11/19

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] M4 - M4P - M4-2
From: jblack at ambio.net (John Black)
Date: Fri Nov 19 08:31:28 2004
References: <200411181800.iAIHvABx027241@server1.waverley.reid.org><Pine.LNX.4.58.0411181049100.31734@mail.2alpha.net> <001301c4cdce$81c51370$1529e652@daniel>



>
> Therefore the M4 is more silent than bot M6 & M4-P.
> I'll probably choose the M4 but if I find a M4-P at a good price, why
> not ! :)
>
>

The M4-P occupies a position in smoothness and reliability midway between
the M4 and M4-2.  If you do not need a self timer and might want to use a
rapidwinder, the M4-P is for you.

I have used several M4-Ps and M4s over the years and find the M4-P, when
properly adjusted, to be fine camera but, if you can afford one, there is
nothing quite like a well tuned M4 unless it is a midrange DS M3 with
geometric shutter (personal prejudice).

You should be able to find a good M4-P for 20-30% less money than a similar
M4.

JB





Replies: Reply from daniel.rocha at free.fr (Daniel ROCHA) ([Leica] M4 - M4P - M4-2)
In reply to: Message from pklein at 2alpha.net (Peter Klein) ([Leica] M4 - M4P - M4-2)
Message from daniel.rocha at free.fr (Daniel ROCHA) ([Leica] M4 - M4P - M4-2)