Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/11/18

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] M4 - M4P - M4-2
From: richard-lists at imagecraft.com (Richard)
Date: Thu Nov 18 04:34:10 2004
References: <000b01c4cd68$8501d840$1529e652@daniel>

My understanding is that the M4-2 is a "low cost," if any Leica can be 
called low cost, model. Some people whose opinions I value a lot opine that 
the M4 is the best Leica there is.

I am an infidel because my first M is the M7. It's a darn fine machine to me.

At 03:41 AM 11/18/2004, Daniel ROCHA wrote:

>Hello all,
>
>In my quest for a M body, I'm look at the M4 bodies.
>
>Is there any one (M4, M4P or the M4-2) that is not
>as reliable than the 2 others ?!
>
>Their prices are different and I don't know if it's better
>to buy one of the 3 M4's !

// richard (This email is for mailing lists. To reach me directly, please 
use richard at imagecraft.com) 


Replies: Reply from daniel.rocha at free.fr (Daniel ROCHA) ([Leica] M4 - M4P - M4-2)
In reply to: Message from daniel.rocha at free.fr (Daniel ROCHA) ([Leica] M4 - M4P - M4-2)