Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/11/12

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] The Leica CL ! or Bessa R3A ?
From: mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner)
Date: Fri Nov 12 14:27:43 2004
 
On 11/12/04 1:48 PM, "Daniel ROCHA" <daniel.rocha@free.fr> typed:

> Mark Rabiner <mark@rabinergroup.com> wrote:
>> I just wanna know how much BIGGER is the R3A than the CL?
> 
> You'r right it's important for me too !
> 
> Google tell me :
> 
> CL     : 121x76x32 for 510gr with 40/2
> R3a   :135.5x81x 33.5mm, 430 grams (w/o lens)
> 
> Nice...
> 
14.5mms longer (half inch, insignificant)
5mms taller
1.5 thicker
80 grams lighter!! (2.8 oz)

Sold

I'm going into this one with both eyes open!




Mark Rabiner
Photography
Portland Oregon
http://rabinergroup.com/
Replies: Reply from daniel.rocha at free.fr (Daniel ROCHA) ([Leica] The Leica CL ! or Bessa R3A ?)
 In reply to: Message from daniel.rocha at free.fr (Daniel ROCHA) ([Leica] The Leica CL ! or Bessa R3A ?)