Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/10/04

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] not-a-lux
From: shino at panix.com (Rei Shinozuka)
Date: Mon Oct 4 06:16:18 2004
References: <20041003174011.GB4347@panix.com> <004e01c4a984$977e71c0$6401a8c0@ccapr.com>

b.d.,

yes, the xenotar appears to produce "misty" but not "swirly".

-rei

On Oct03 16:07, B. D. Colen wrote:
> ...
> By the way, the depth of field comparison is quite interesting. And of
> course we get to see the shallow depth of field with a much less
> disturbing bokeh... ;-)
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rei Shinozuka
> Subject: [Leica] not-a-lux
> 
> as a fan of the noctilux, i've recently come across the schneider 
> xenotar 150mm/f2.8 and ran it though some of the images i normally take
> with the noctilux:
> 
> http://www.shinozuka.org/20040914-xeno/
> 
> to keep everything on-topic,
> at the bottom i show the xenotar rig next to the noctilux.  no one ought
> ever complain about the size and weight of the noctilux.
> 
> -rei

-- 
Rei Shinozuka shino@panix.com
Ridgewood, New Jersey


Replies: Reply from bdcolen at earthlink.net (B. D. Colen) ([Leica] not-a-lux)
Reply from daniel.ridings at edd.uio.no (Daniel Ridings) ([Leica] not-a-lux)
In reply to: Message from shino at panix.com (Rei Shinozuka) ([Leica] not-a-lux)
Message from bdcolen at earthlink.net (B. D. Colen) ([Leica] not-a-lux)