Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/09/04

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Attachments?
From: reid at mejac.palo-alto.ca.us (Brian Reid)
Date: Sat Sep 4 06:33:27 2004
References: <000701c40f9f$33601c90$6501a8c0@dorysrusp4>
 
It wasn't actually an attachment, though I know that Outlook flags them as 
such.
It was a "text part". The original message had some forbidden content in it, 
and the software removed that. Making a cut in the message divided it into 
two parts, neither of which is an attachment to the other. Microsoft mailers 
have never heard of multi-part messages outside the context of attachments, 
so they flag such things as attachments.

> So what was with the attachment on the LUG?  Some new capability or a
> really clever virus propagator?
Replies: Reply from dorysrus at mindspring.com (Don Dory) ([Leica] Attachments?)
Reply from red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] Attachments?)
 In reply to: Message from dorysrus at mindspring.com (Don Dory) ([Leica] Attachments?)