Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/08/29
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]At 8:27 AM +0200 8/28/04, Nathan Wajsman wrote: >Nice to know that I have 3 or 4 of the top 10 in my stash. But any >list that omits Lagavullin is flawed... > >Nathan Agreed. But then I substitute the Lagavullin 16yr (my favourite type) for the 1964 Bowmore, which is never going to happen for me in any case, and all is well again. If it ever comes to: Shall I get that 35 Summilux ASPH or that bottle of Scotch? I'm fairly confident of coming to a satisfactory answer. Some of the others mentioned are very nice, and some are truly excellent, but the Lagavullin is in a class of its own. -- * Henning J. Wulff /|\ Wulff Photography & Design /###\ mailto:henningw@archiphoto.com |[ ]| http://www.archiphoto.com