Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/08/23

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] 50 Summilux-Asph update
From: jbcollier at shaw.ca (John Collier)
Date: Mon Aug 23 04:59:36 2004
References: <2906535AB89CD71199C70002A513ADBD0898AAD5@exlon05b.lehman.com>

Even NASA has had troubles with no expense spared camera gear costing a 
few orders of magnitude more.

I work(ed) in the automotive repair field and I have never found any 
correlation between money spent and reliability.

John Collier

On Aug 23, 2004, at 4:25 AM, Beddoe, Neil wrote:

> If this was a ?200 consumer zoom I might agree that you could expect a 
> few
> teething problems.  I don't think they are to be expected from a 
> ?1,500 one.
>
> On Behalf Of John Collier
>
> Well I am back from Ireland and the Summilux is now going back to its
> makers to hopefully sort out a few problems with it focusing and
> rangefinder coupling. The stickiness when going from 0.7m to infinity
> stopped getting better and the rangefinder images did not quite meet at
> infinity. I will let you know when it gets back, if they did anything
> and if what they did fixed the problems.
>
> Still basically happy as I am not surprised that the first series of a
> new product would have some teething problems.


In reply to: Message from nbeddoe at lehman.com (Beddoe, Neil) ([Leica] 50 Summilux-Asph update)