Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/08/17

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Re: Re: the first IIIg
From: raikorho at uusikaupunki.fi (Raimo K)
Date: Tue Aug 17 12:58:28 2004
References: <412238F2.5060706@cox.net><2147483647.1092737400@dhcp-219.sql1.isc.org> <6.1.1.1.2.20040817101520.0579a7e8@mail.brick.org>
 
Highly unlikely - with FEDs and Zorkis used as a base.
All the best!
Raimo K
Personal photography homepage at:
http://www.uusikaupunki.fi/~raikorho


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "JCB" <jcb@visualimpressions.com>
To: "Leica Users Group" <lug@leica-users.org>
Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2004 8:21 PM
Subject: [Leica] Re: Re: the first IIIg 


> At 10:10 AM 8/17/2004, Brian Reid wrote:
> 
<snip> 
> If you look at it another way, a fake might be completely hand made. It 
> might actually be better than the original since everything is checked, 
> double checked, triple measured, hand finished, etc.
> 
> JB 
>
Replies: Reply from bdcolen at earthlink.net (B. D. Colen) ([Leica] Re: Re: the first IIIg)
 In reply to: Message from doubs43 at cox.net (Walker Smith) ([Leica] Re: the first IIIg)
Message from reid at mejac.palo-alto.ca.us (Brian Reid) ([Leica] Re: the first IIIg)
Message from jcb at visualimpressions.com (JCB) ([Leica] Re: Re: the first IIIg)