Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/07/14

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Reality Check re: Digital vs Film vs Cost
From: feli at creocollective.com (Feli di Giorgio)
Date: Wed Jul 14 10:25:33 2004
References: <004d01c469b0$039dcb90$35b1fea9@ccapr.com>
 
On Wed, 2004-07-14 at 07:36, B. D. Colen wrote:
>  But what happens when the 35 mm operation itself is no
> longer worth their time and investment? I'm not suggesting that that
> point will come today or tomorrow, but I certainly wouldn't be surprised
> to see the number of film choices decline sharply over the next five
> years. And then what?
> B. D.

As long as they keep making Tri-X, nobody gets hurt.
;-)

Feli
Replies: Reply from locke at straylight.ca (Greg Locke) ([Leica] Reality Check re: Digital vs Film vs Cost)
 In reply to: Message from bdcolen at earthlink.net (B. D. Colen) ([Leica] Reality Check re: Digital vs Film vs Cost)