Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/07/13

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Why a digital M
From: feli at creocollective.com (Feli di Giorgio)
Date: Tue Jul 13 09:58:35 2004
References: <f4.3d62695c.2e24bf17@aol.com> <1089693478.4798.19.camel@failsafe> <391B3C8A-D4B3-11D8-86F7-000A27E2AA4E@ubi.edu>
 
On Tue, 2004-07-13 at 02:58, Lucien wrote:

> Feli,
> 
> Yes, but the 1Ds don't use Leica M wide-angle lenses.
> 
> That's a different story !
> 
> The Canon 24-70/2,8 and 16-35/2,8 were designed with digital in mind.
> 
> Lucien

Frankly I wouldn't mind losing a few of my lenses if in exchange I could get
a full frame chip. I mostly use 35/50/90 and have a VC 4/21. If I lost the 21
and had to buy a new one specifically designed for a full frame M I would 
yelp
and then life would go on.
;-)

Feli
In reply to: Message from Afterswift at aol.com (Afterswift@aol.com) ([Leica] Why a digital M)
Message from feli at creocollective.com (Feli di Giorgio) ([Leica] Why a digital M)
Message from director at ubi.edu (Lucien) ([Leica] Why a digital M)