Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/06/21
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Dan Cardish wrote: >Yes, he likes it, but he also notes "Bo-ke aficionados will have mixed >feelings about the performance of the lens". > >This is what I fear about the new lens. The old lens had beautiful bokeh, >but from the way he describes it, the new one is awful. > > It is fairly well known that spherical (and other) aberrations can have a decidedly pleasing effect on photographs, particularly portraits. For example the Kodak Portrait lens was *designed* to have aberrations wide open, improving when stopped down, such that one could select how much effect was desired. Of course not all aberrations are visually pleasing, so the design of a good portrait lens, as is the design of a lens with pleasing "bo-keh" remains an art form. I am not surprised that the latest and greatest aspherical computer designs -- which seek to eliminate aberrations -- may not always provide the most pleasing of the intangible renderings of an image. The old 35/1.4 with its flare and all wide open, still has a warm and cozy place in my camera bag. As I recall this is a symmetric design modulo a thin meniscus and and consequently I'd expect a fairly rectilinear image. Jonathan