Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/05/21

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: "unnecessary paranoia"
From: SonC at aol.com (SonC@aol.com)
Date: Fri May 21 07:47:32 2004

HA!  Only camera I ever had stolen was in a Church during a Diocean  
Convention.  God was good to me though, the insurance enabled me to buy my  M6.
SonC
In a message dated 5/21/2004 9:32:27 AM Central Standard Time,  
Thinkofcole@aol.com writes:

Nathan  Wajsman says it's "unnecessary paranoia" to feel as I do that it's 
not  very wise these days to wander around a strange country with lots of  
expensive Leica stuff. 
I accept the charge but it's one  thing to recover the loss by insuring 
one's property and another to face  the consequences when you suffer a loss. 
My wife and I have  had our bags rifled in a nice hotel in Mexico City 
many years ago, I have  been held up at gunpoint at 3 am in a Times Square 
parking 
garage --  losing an 18k Rolex-- after getting out of work 15 years ago, I 
have had a  Leica stolen at a New Jersey camera show a couple of years ago, 
one of 
my  daughters has had her pocket picked on a Madrid subway a long time ago,  
and my father-in-law was relieved of a Leica on Eighth Avenue in  Manhattan, 
also 
long ago. 
I suppose it's just bad luck  all around and, besides, nobody should be 
out at 3 am I guess.  
But most of this happened in the good old days when none of  this was 
supposed to happen. Today it's differen. -- bob  cole
_______________________________________________
Regards,  

Sonny
_http://www.sonc.com_ (http://www.sonc.com/) 




Replies: Reply from jls at runbox.com (Jeffery Smith) ([Leica] Re: "unnecessary paranoia")
Reply from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Re: "unnecessary paranoia")