Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/05/17
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]On 5/17/04 1:49 PM, "B. D. Colen" <bdcolen@earthlink.net> wrote: > Not to start a flame war, but it seems to be this is letting the cart > decide where the horse should pull it. If one prefers Tri-X to Delta > 400, figure out how best to scan it, don't just switch films because the > other "scans better." I have to say, and I think have before, that I > don't get the complaints about scanning tri-x..... > Either do as which is lucky as I have been shooting it since 1964 and I have a backlog of scanning to do on it. I've found the Nikon 5000 does a better job than the 2000. Which is why my local kindergarten wouldn?t take mine. Still no ICE though what if someone came out with a cleaner thing you put right in front of your scanner. Maybe attached to it? For strip negs that is but I guess also for slides. Mark Rabiner Photography Portland Oregon Here's an old 60's tri x shot I probably have shown here before. http://rabinergroup.com/ImagePages/Motherchildindoorpage.html Taken with a Voigtl?nder Vito BL which my grandfather gave to my father and my father gave to me (when he got his Contarex Bullseye). My grandfather, father and myself all share the fact that we were all born in Brooklyn New York. But on different days. New-improved http://rabinergroup.com/