Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/05/07
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Canon_is_good. They have that edge resolution thing going that makes them get real close to the Leica optics. I recently got a Canon 24-85mm for a light load, and quick and dirty work. Every time I shoot with it, I can hear the cash register going ka-ching, ka-ching, because of customer satisfaction. In my case, I usually get asked for prints and a CD on those kind of shoots. As far as my scientific test methods are concerned, all I need is the check in the mail. S. Dimitrov > From: Ted Grant <tedgrant@shaw.ca> > ..... > Anyway this difference is quite easy to see when you're looking at hundreds > of transparencies lying out on light tables. Actually it's tougher between > Leica and Canon, than Nikon - Leica. There seems to be a similar look to the > Canon and Leica material. The Nikon is not as sharp looking, ( don't get yer > pants wet! I did say "looking!" It wasn't a scientific test,) Eye balls! > Nor do the colours have the same snap to them. > > So it's quite easy to observe this difference when there's a volume of > material being observed over a period of time. > ted > > > >