Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/05/05

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] ten years behind
From: DouglasMSharp at netscape.net (Douglas M. Sharp)
Date: Wed May 5 09:31:03 2004

Leica, built for the future with yesterdays technology !

On the state of the art as represented by Leica cameras I can only agree 
with Ted, but wasn't Leica always the world leader in
high quality optics ? If they hadn't been so pig-headed with their 
philosophy of "Leica lenses only for Leica cameras" they
could have made a fortune producing for other mounts. After all the 
camera body is only a box for holding the film
and partly governing the amount of light which reaches it, it's the lens 
(the German word "Objektiv" is a lot more descriptive)
that does the real work of getting the quality of image  that the 
photographer wants. This was admirably proved by the Bessa L,
a lens with a camera on it.

Douglas
BTW  I personally hate the design of the R8 and R9, they may be 
ergonomically designed but they look awful.

>
> Ted Grant wrote:
>
>> B. D. said:
>>
>>
>>>>>> The bottom line is that most PEOPLE don't know that Leica ever 
>>>>>> existed,
>>>>>
>>>
>>> or exists. Since at least the 1970s Leica has been a boutique brand 
>>> in a
>>> WalMart world.....<<<
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Leica were ten years behind all other SLR manufactures and to date 
>> haven't
>> caught up, let alone in the digital manufacturing of a digital 
>> camera. Yep
>> the digi back is coming? So are twelve blue moons in the southern 
>> sky! If it
>> works as they claim that's great, yes some folks will buy it, but at 
>> what
>> cost? It isn't like buying an amazing piece of Leica created glass.
>>
>>
>>
>> ted
>>



Replies: Reply from feli at creocollective.com (Feli di Giorgio) ([Leica] ten years behind)
Reply from kitmc at acmefoto.com (Kit McChesney) ([Leica] ten years behind)
Reply from tedgrant at shaw.ca (Ted Grant) ([Leica] ten years behind)