Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/04/18[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
At 07:24 PM 4/18/04 -0400, Jim Hemenway wrote: > > I do not post political commentary on the LUG save in response to the > > inveterate and outrageous postings of others. > >And there's the problem, you then only help perpetuate those political >threads. I say again, please respond on the Lugforum and spare us. > >Jim - http://www.hemenway.com Jim You fuss at me. Why did you not fuss at the ten or so progenitors of this thread? Was it only because I was the one honest enough to change the SUBJ: line? Pray, remain steadfast: if your role is to schuss those posting political commentary on the LUG, then this really ought to be a universal reaction and not one inflicted only on a single responder. In other words, it would appear that you were not following the STARBUCKS thread and, hence, did not understand that it had become politicized until I changed the SUBJ: line. But, in the end, your ire and wrath should be directed against those who caused this thread to drift off onto political topics (where it has lingered for a day or more) rather than at me; I am, at the best, a very late participant in this thread. If there is shame here, it is shame to you for not having followed the Starbucks thread as you ought to have done to have nipped this politicization in the bud early on. Marc firstname.lastname@example.org FAX: +540/343-7315 Cha robh b?s fir gun ghr?s fir!